A few other officials of the utility and their spouses or other guests are also invited, as is a representative of a consumer group concerned with utility rates and her spouse. Although the employee and the individual are connected through social media, the circumstances do not demonstrate that the gift was clearly motivated by a personal relationship, rather than the position of the employee, and therefore the employee may not accept the gift pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section.Īn employee of the Department of Energy (DOE) and his spouse have been invited by a major utility executive to a small dinner party. One day, the individual, whose employer continues to serve as a Peace Corps contractor, contacts the employee to offer him a pair of concert tickets worth $30 apiece. However, they did not communicate further in their personal capacities, carry on extensive personal interactions, or meet socially outside of work.
They later also granted one another access to join their social media networks through their respective social media accounts. Thereafter, the two communicated occasionally regarding contract matters. The employee was acting in his official capacity when he met the individual at a meeting to discuss a matter related to the contract between their respective employers. One of these individuals works for a contractor that provides language services to the Peace Corps.
#Donut county getaway vehicle professional
He has used the site to keep in touch with friends, neighbors, coworkers, professional contacts, and other individuals he has met over the years through both work and personal activities. 535 to report any information he receives relating to a violation of the criminal code, title 18 of the United States Code.Ī Peace Corps employee enjoys using a social media site on the internet in his personal capacity outside of work. An agency ethics official is required by 28 U.S.C. Disclosures made by an employee to an agency ethics official are not protected by an attorney-client privilege. However, good faith reliance on the advice of an agency ethics official is a factor that may be taken into account by the Department of Justice in the selection of cases for prosecution. Where the employee's conduct violates a criminal statute, reliance on the advice of an agency ethics official cannot ensure that the employee will not be prosecuted under that statute.
#Donut county getaway vehicle full
Disciplinary action for violating this part or any supplemental agency regulations will not be taken against an employee who has engaged in conduct in good faith reliance upon the advice of an agency ethics official, provided that the employee, in seeking such advice, has made full disclosure of all relevant circumstances. (b ) Employees who have questions about the application of this part or any supplemental agency regulations to particular situations should seek advice from an agency ethics official. § 2635.806 Participation in professional associations. Outside earned income limitations applicable to certain Presidential appointees and other noncareer employees. Prior approval for outside employment and activities. Notification requirements for public financial disclosure report filers regarding negotiations for or agreement of future employment or compensation.Ĭonflicting outside employment and activities. Recusal based on an arrangement concerning prospective employment or otherwise after negotiations. Waiver or authorization permitting participation while seeking employment. Impartiality in Performing Official DutiesĮxtraordinary payments from former employers.Īpplicability and related considerations. General prohibition on solicitation or acceptance of gifts.Įxceptions to the prohibition for acceptance of certain gifts. Overview and considerations for declining otherwise permissible gifts. Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive BranchĪpplicability to members of the uniformed services.
0 kommentar(er)
